Hamed Ghoddusi Johari; Seyed Arman Moein; Ahmad Hosseinzadeh; Javad Kojuri; Amirhossein Roshanshad; Reza Shahriarirad
Volume 10, Issue 3 , July 2022, , Pages 103-109
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of chest x-ray (CXR) in blunt traumatic aortic injury (BTAI) as a primaryimaging tool in trauma patients.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our hospital records for blunt thoracic aortic injury patients who had atherapeutic intervention from January 2015 to February ...
Read More
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of chest x-ray (CXR) in blunt traumatic aortic injury (BTAI) as a primaryimaging tool in trauma patients.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our hospital records for blunt thoracic aortic injury patients who had atherapeutic intervention from January 2015 to February 2021. Patients’ characteristics, initial chest x-rays, andcomputed tomography (CT) scan were extracted and re-evaluated.Results: Eighteen patients matched the criteria of our research. The mean age and the injury severity score(ISS) was 29.8±11.2 and 38.4±14.4, respectively. Seven patients (38.9%) underwent thoracic endovascularaortic repair (TEVAR), and 11 (61.1%) had open surgery. The TEVAR group had significantly lower meanintensive care unit stay days (6.6±3.9 vs. 10.8±6.9 in open aortic repair (OAR), p<0.05). The percentile ofpatients requiring blood transfusion was significantly lower in the TEVAR group (57% vs. 100% in OAR,p<0.05). Mediastinal widening (66.7%) was the most common finding during the evaluation of initial chestx-rays. Interestingly, 22.2% of the initial x-rays were not remarkable for BTAI.Conclusion: TEVAR is an advantageous choice in the management of BTAI. However, open aortic repair is theoptimal decision in certain situations. It is suggested that the Interventional management of the BTAI must beperformed by experienced vascular surgeons in a medical center capable of both OAR and TEVAR.
Hossein Hodjati; Ahmad Hoseinzadeh; Seyed Masoud Mousavi; Seifollah Dehghani Nazhavi; Viginda Kumar; Maryam Sehhatpour
Volume 5, Issue 1 , January 2017, , Pages 24-28
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and results of using serosal patch of small bowel for repair and replacement of inferior vena cava (IVC) after resection of a part of infra-renal IVC in an animal model, as it may be encountered in extensive tumors of retroperitoneal and trauma patients.Methods: ...
Read More
Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and results of using serosal patch of small bowel for repair and replacement of inferior vena cava (IVC) after resection of a part of infra-renal IVC in an animal model, as it may be encountered in extensive tumors of retroperitoneal and trauma patients.Methods: Five healthy sheep of both sexes were prepared. After general anesthesia and laparotomy, a defect with 1 cm width and 4cm length was made on anterior aspect of infra-renal IVC, and then an adjacent loop of small bowel was brought and sutured continuously to cover the defect of IVC as a patch graft. The observation period was two months.Results: Three of five IVCs were macroscopically patent without stenosis and thrombosis. Pathologic assay revealed complete endothelialization of serosal surface of the patch of small bowel loop. One of IVCs was completely occluded in gross evaluation and fibrous formation in pathologist review. The sheep had no sign of venous hypertension and edema of limbs. One sheep died at the night of first operation due to internal bleeding.Conclusion: Serosal patch of small bowel is an accessible and feasible alternative in repair and reconstruction of IVC especially when there is restriction for use of prosthetic material in a contaminated space of abdomen.
Shahram Paydar; Mojtaba Mahmoodi; Mohammad Jamshidi; Hadi Niakan; Mohammad Keshavarz; Nader Moeenvaziri; Mohammad Esmaeil Ghorbaninejad; Farnaz Farrokhnia; Forough Izadi Fard; Zahra Jaafari; Yalda Golshan; Hamidreza Abbasi; Shahram Bolandparvaz; Behnam Honarvar
Volume 2, Issue 3 , July 2014, , Pages 103-109
Abstract
Objective: To explore the pros and cons of early versus delayed intervention when dealing with severe blunt liver injury with significant hemoperitoneum and hemodynamic instability.Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study was performed at the Nemazi hospital, Shiraz, Southern Iran, level I trauma ...
Read More
Objective: To explore the pros and cons of early versus delayed intervention when dealing with severe blunt liver injury with significant hemoperitoneum and hemodynamic instability.Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study was performed at the Nemazi hospital, Shiraz, Southern Iran, level I trauma Center affiliated with Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. The study population comprised of all patients who were operated with the impression of blunt abdominal trauma and confirmed diagnosis of liver trauma during an 8-year period. All data were extracted from patients’ hospital medical records during the study period. The patients’ outcome was compared between those who underwent perihepatic packing or primary surgical repair.Results: Medical records of 76 patients with blunt abdominal liver trauma who underwent surgical intervention were evaluated. Perihepatic packing was performed more in patients who have been transferred to operation room due to unstable hemodynamics (p<0.001) as well as in patients with more than 1000 milliliters of hemoperitoneum based on pre-operative imaging studies (e.g. CT/US) (p=0.002).Conclusion: We recommend that trauma surgeons should approach perihepatic packing earlier in patients who have been developed at least two of these three criteria; unstable hemodynamics, more than 1000 milliliters hemoperitoneum and more than 1600 milliliters of intra-operative estimated blood loss. We believe that considering these criteria will help trauma surgeons to diagnose and treat high risk patients in time so significant hemorrhage (e.g. caused by dilatational coagulopathy, hypothermia and acidosis, etc.) can ultimately be prevented and more lives can be saved.
