Mehrdad Amir-Behghadami; Masoumeh Gholizadeh; Ali Janati
Volume 8, Issue 1 , January 2020, , Pages 49-50
Abstract
Dear editor, Recently, we read with great interest the article authored by Jadidi et al. [1] that was entitled“Is emergency medical services (EMS) in Islamic Republic of Iran practical and efficient in facingEbola?” and published in Bull Emerg Trauma in 2019, in 7th volume ...
Read More
Dear editor, Recently, we read with great interest the article authored by Jadidi et al. [1] that was entitled“Is emergency medical services (EMS) in Islamic Republic of Iran practical and efficient in facingEbola?” and published in Bull Emerg Trauma in 2019, in 7th volume and 3rd issue. First of all, wewould like to extend our gratitude to the authors of this article. Although the mentioned study wasappropriate and valuable, there was a fundamental flaw in the method, which has led to an ambiguous interpretation of the findings. Therefore, the purpose of this letter is to raise concerns about the data collection instrument and emphasize the importance of reporting its validity and reliability in crosssectional studies.
Masoumeh Gholizadeh; Mehrdad Amir-Behghadami; Ali Janati
Volume 8, Issue 1 , January 2020, , Pages 51-52
Abstract
Dear editor, Recently, Ayalew et al. have published an article, titled, “Drug related hospital admissions; Asystematic review of the recent literatures” in Bull Emerg Trauma in 2019, 7th volume and 4th issue that has been caught our attention [1]. Even though the results ...
Read More
Dear editor, Recently, Ayalew et al. have published an article, titled, “Drug related hospital admissions; Asystematic review of the recent literatures” in Bull Emerg Trauma in 2019, 7th volume and 4th issue that has been caught our attention [1]. Even though the results of the study are interesting, there are flaws due to the authors’ negligence in the method, which leads to ambiguity in the interpretation of the findings. Therefore, the points expressed in this letter indicate what are needed to be perused in reporting systematic reviews.
Mehrdad Amir Behghadami; Ali Janati
Volume 7, Issue 4 , October 2019, , Pages 429-430
Abstract
Dear editor, Recently a study titled, “A Productive Proposed Search Syntax for Health Disaster Preparedness Research”, was worked by Rastegarfar et al. in the Bulletin of Emergency And Trauma [1]. First of all, we would like to thank the editors that help to appear review study. In addition, ...
Read More
Dear editor, Recently a study titled, “A Productive Proposed Search Syntax for Health Disaster Preparedness Research”, was worked by Rastegarfar et al. in the Bulletin of Emergency And Trauma [1]. First of all, we would like to thank the editors that help to appear review study. In addition, we would like to extend our appreciation to the authors of this article. Review studies are considered as studies with the highest level of evidence that play an important role in evidence-based decision making [2]. The results of the mentioned study are an interesting; however, we believe that there are some questions regarding the study, which, we would like to present. These questions, if replied, will only apply to improve the quality of the current study and similar studies in the near future.
Mehrdad Amir Behghadami; Ali Janati; Homayoun Sadeghi-Bazargani; Masoumeh Gholizadeh; Farzad Rahmani; Morteza Arab-Zozani
Volume 7, Issue 3 , July 2019, , Pages 201-211
Abstract
Objectives: To identify prevalent domains related to the concept of assessing preparedness of non-hospital centers to provide primary emergency care in order to develop a comprehensive framework.Methods: Five databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of science, Barakat Knowledge Network Systems (BKNS) ...
Read More
Objectives: To identify prevalent domains related to the concept of assessing preparedness of non-hospital centers to provide primary emergency care in order to develop a comprehensive framework.Methods: Five databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of science, Barakat Knowledge Network Systems (BKNS) and Scientific Information Database (SID) were searched in English and/or Persian languages with no time limit until March, 2018. Manual search and grey literature were also done. According to the eligibility criteria, all the studies were independently tracked by two researchers. Studies were appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). The findings were synthesized through directed content analysis method.Results: Out of 3014 studies, 15 studies were included for data synthesis. The synthesis of literature resulted in the emergence of 13 domains and 25 sub-domains. Then, they were categorized based on Donabedian’s triple model and a conceptual framework was developed. In this framework, 6 domains were put in input, 6 in processes, and 1 domain in outcome. Of the 15 included studies, 1 study considered 10 domains and 14 other studies considered 4 to 8 domains out of 13 synthesized domains. The most prevalent synthesized domains were “medical supplies and equipment” and “human resources”, which were considered in 15 studies.Conclusion: In this study, a conceptual framework was constructed that identifies elements that significantly affect the preparedness of these centers. This framework may assist managers to take a comprehensive approach to assess these centers.
