Armin Akbarzadeh; Ehsan Fallah; Seyed Ali Hashemi; Seyed Mohammad Tahami; Babak Pourabbas; Saeed Solooki
Volume 11, Issue 2 , April 2023, , Pages 69-74
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the radiologic and clinical outcomes of TKA with non-stemmed tibial components in relation to their body mass index (BMI).Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, the outcome of TKA with non-stemmed tibial components based on their BMI was evaluated (BMI<30 ...
Read More
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the radiologic and clinical outcomes of TKA with non-stemmed tibial components in relation to their body mass index (BMI).Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, the outcome of TKA with non-stemmed tibial components based on their BMI was evaluated (BMI<30 vs. BMI≥30). The patients’ function was assessed using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm knee questionnaires. Radiologic evaluation for probable signs of loosening was performed using two quantitative scoring systems by Ewald and Bach et al. Moreover, we reviewed the current literature on the application of non-stemmed tibial components in obese patients.Results: Twenty-one patients (two men and 19 women) with BMI≥30 and a mean age of 65.1±9.5 years, and 22 patients (three men and 19 women) with BMI<30 and a mean age of 63.6±8.5 years were studied. The mean follow-up periods with BMI≥30 (47.0±19.8 months) and BMI<30 (49.2±18.7 months) were comparable (p=0.618). No patients in either group experienced clinical loosening. Besides, none of the patients had any kind of revision surgery. The patients in both BMI groups had comparable IKDC scores (both the total score and its sub-scores; p>0.05). Furthermore, the total Lysholm knee scores were similar in both groups (p=0.122). Using both scoring systems, the peri-prosthetic bone radiolucency near the tibial components was similar in both groups (p>0.999).Conclusion: The present study found no significant difference in the radiologic or clinical outcome of unstemmed TKA in patients with BMIs under and over 30.
Farris Serio; Quinn Fujii; Keval Shah; Andrew McCague
Volume 6, Issue 4 , October 2018, , Pages 325-328
Abstract
Objective: To determine if there was any decrease in measures of injury severity or outcome with obese patients (body mass index greater than or equal to 30 kg/m2) as compared to non-obese patients (body mass index less than 30 kg/m2).Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of the trauma database ...
Read More
Objective: To determine if there was any decrease in measures of injury severity or outcome with obese patients (body mass index greater than or equal to 30 kg/m2) as compared to non-obese patients (body mass index less than 30 kg/m2).Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of the trauma database maintained by Natividad Medical Center's Level 2-Trauma program. From July 1st, 2014 to July 1st, 2017 there were 371 cases of penetrating trauma in adults between the ages of 18-80 years old. Overall 311 patients had BMI data recorded. We divided these 311 patients into two groups: penetrating injury due to firearm (n= 198) and penetrating injury due to stabbing or piercing (n=113). We compared non-obese patients against obese patients for age, gender, Injury Severity Score (ISS), length of stay (LOS), Intensive Care Unit LOS, units of blood given, direct transfer from ED to operating room, and mortality.Results: A total of 311 patients were included in the study, 198 (63.6%) patients suffered from gunshot wounds and 113 (36.4) from stab or piercing wounds. The mean age was 33.6 ± 12.8 and there were 283 (91%) men among the victims. Overall 87 (28%) required emergent surgery and a 19 (6.1%) mortality rate was recorded. In the gunshot wound group there was no significant difference between non-obese and obese patients for age (p=0.400), gender (p=0.900), ISS (p=0.544), LOS (p=0.273), Intensive Care Unit LOS (p=0.729), units of blood given (p=0.300), or mortality (p=0.855). We found that in the stab or piercing group there was no significant difference between non-obese and obese patients for age (p=0.900), gender (p=0.900), ISS (p=0.580), LOS (p=0.839), Intensive Care Unit LOS (p=0.305), units of blood given (p=0.431), or mortality (p=0.321).Conclusion: Our findings indicate that in our patient population, there was no significant difference in markers of injury severity, morbidity, or mortality in adult non-obese patients as comparted with obese patients. Furthermore, there was no significant difference between the two groups in operative rates, suggesting that obesity may not confer a protective effect in penetrating trauma.